Skip to content

Contemplative Science and Secular Ethics

Brendan Ozawa-de Silva

Religions August 8, 2016 DOI: 10.3390/rel7080098 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Case report Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Contemplative science Compassion Secular ethics Lojong
Key points Argues that contemplative science should include analytical meditation styles and address ethics as a framework for understanding contemplative practice.

Abstract

This article argues that the emerging project of contemplative science will be best served if it is informed by two perspectives. First, attention should be paid not only to non-analytical and/or mindfulness-based practices, but to a fuller range of contemplative practices, including analytical styles of meditation. Second, the issue of ethics must be addressed as a framework within which to understand contemplative practice: both theoretically in order to understand better the practices themselves and the traditions they come from, and practically in order to understand the ways in which contemplative practices are deployed in contemporary societies. The Tibetan Buddhist Lojong (blo sbyong) tradition and secularized practices derived from it, which are now an area of study in contemplative science, are examined as a kind of case study in order to make these two points and illustrate their importance and relevance for the future of this emerging field.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on meditation, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics