Skip to content

Experiences and user perceptions of virtual-reality-based mindfulness interventions: protocol for a systematic review and thematic synthesis

Ravi Shankar, Anjali Bundele, Amanda Yap, Amartya Mukhopadhyay

BMJ Open September 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094876 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review protocol Qualitative Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Protocol science Thematic analysis Perception Qualitative research Public health Medical education Applied psychology Nursing Thematic map Medline Health services research
Citations 1
Key findings The protocol outlines methods for synthesizing qualitative research on user experiences of VR-based mindfulness interventions, but no findings are yet reported.

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly being explored as a medium for delivering mindfulness-based interventions. While studies have investigated the feasibility and efficacy of VR-based mindfulness interventions, there has been limited synthesis of user experiences and perceptions across diverse applications, hindering the iterative refinement of these technologies and limiting evidence-based guidance for effective deployment in real-world settings. This systematic review aims to comprehensively identify, appraise and synthesise qualitative research on end-user experiences and perceptions of VR-based mindfulness interventions. Understanding user experiences is critical for translating research findings into practical design improvements and implementation strategies that enhance intervention effectiveness and user adoption.

Methods: AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Scopus from inception to present. Studies reporting qualitative data on adult participants' experiences, perceptions, attitudes or opinions related to VR-based mindfulness interventions will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies, extract data and assess methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Thematic synthesis will be used to analyse the qualitative data. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research approach will be applied to assess confidence in the review findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will be based on published studies. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024594330.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics