Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Contemplative Psychology: History, Key Assumptions, and Future Directions.

William van Gordon, Supakyada Sapthiang, Edo Shonin

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science January 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1177/1745691620984479 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Contemplative psychology is defined as the psychological study of contemplative processes and practices including meditation, mindfulness, yoga, introspection, reflection, metacognition, self-regulation, self-awareness, and self-consciousness. The discipline shares borders with other psychological and nonpsychological fields but is distinguished by its underlying assumptions, areas of empirical focus, conceptual nuances, and challenges. The field has been somewhat disparate in investigating its core techniques and principles, creating a need for greater intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary awareness. This article adopts a whole-discipline perspective to explicate contemplative psychology's history, breadth, key assumptions, challenges, and future directions.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Buddhist meditation Contemplation Contemplative psychology Emptiness Introspection
Key finding Argues that contemplative psychology's disparate approach to investigating its core techniques and principles calls for a whole-discipline perspective to integrate its history, assumptions, and future directions.

Abstract

Contemplative psychology is concerned with the psychological study of contemplative processes and practices, such as meditation, mindfulness, yoga, introspection, reflection, metacognition, self-regulation, self-awareness, and self-consciousness. Although contemplative psychology borders with other psychological and nonpsychological disciplines, some of its underlying assumptions distinguish it from other remits of psychological and scholarly inquiry, as do its component areas of empirical focus, conceptual nuances, and challenges. Furthermore, the discipline has tended to be somewhat disparate in its approach to investigating the core techniques and principles of which it is composed, resulting in a need for greater intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary awareness of the commonalities and differences of core contemplative psychology attributes. As a remedy to these issues, in this article, we adopt a whole-discipline perspective and aim to explicate contemplative psychology's history, breadth, key assumptions, challenges, and future directions.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment