Skip to content

Towards the development of personalized and generalized interfaces for brain signals across different styles of meditation

Shruti Singh, Pankaja Pandey, Shivam Chaudhary, K. Miyapuram, J. Lomas

Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing December 8, 2022 DOI: 10.1145/3571600.3571656 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Population Expert meditators of Himalayan Yoga, Vipassana, Isha Shoonya, and non-expert control subjects
Topics Meditation
Key findings Machine learning models can distinguish neural oscillations of meditators from non-meditators, with within-subject classification achieving maximum accuracy and cross-subject accuracy reaching 18.3% above chance in some conditions.

Abstract

Human-computer interaction investigates how people learn from technology, and how they use technology in everyday life. Researchers have used brain-computer interfaces to understand how technology can be designed to support human cognition and behavior. The most famous and consumer-friendly approach to measuring brain signals is electroencephalography (EEG) due to its non-invasive, portable, relatively inexpensive, and high temporal resolution. In this study, we develop machine learning models to distinguish between the neural oscillations of meditators and non-meditators. Previous studies have used power spectrum density, entropy, and functional connectivity to distinguish various meditation traditions. We use EEG data set comprising neural activity of expert meditators of Himalayan Yoga (HYT), Vipassana (VIP), Isha Shoonya (SYN), and non-expert control subjects (CTR). We analyze the data using 13 different machine learning models for within-subject and cross-subject. We present the results for six classification conditions for both meditation and mind-wandering. Features extracted from the mean of 64 EEG time series are fed into machine learning classifiers during training. We obtain maximum accuracy for within-subject classification in both meditation and mind-wandering. In cross-subject analysis, we obtained 18.3% above chance level in meditation between control and Isha Shoonya, and similarly above 18% chance level in mind-wandering between control and Vipassana. We discuss the implications of this result for the emerging consumer EEG headset facilitating meditation practice. Our results indicate that personalized models (within-subject) and generalized models (cross-subject) could guide naive (beginner) practitioners to meditate and aim to modulate brain signals by practicing to reach the expert level.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Undergraduate students 2006 Observational cohort
Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders Patients with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder with or without agoraphobia 1992 Observational cohort n = 22
Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness Participants with extensive Insight meditation experience and matched controls 2005 Observational cohort n = 20
Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity Experienced meditators and matched meditation-naive controls 2011 Observational cohort
Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice Long-term Buddhist practitioners and controls 2004 Observational cohort

Citations in the library

Explore topics