Baseline brain activity predicts response to neuromodulatory pain treatment.
Mark P Jensen, Leslie H Sherlin, Felipe Fregni, Ann Gianas, Jon D Howe, Shahin Hakimian
Pain Medicine December 1, 2014 DOI: 10.1111/pme.12546 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Randomized controlled study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 30 |
| Population | Individuals with spinal cord injury and chronic pain |
| Interventions | hypnosis meditation EEG biofeedback transcranial direct current stimulation sham transcranial direct current stimulation |
| Duration | Single sessions |
| Keywords | Chronic pain Electroencephalography Nonpharmacological treatments Spinal cord injury |
| Key points | More presession theta power was associated with greater response to hypnotic analgesia, and less baseline alpha power predicted pain reduction with meditation. |
Abstract
The objective of this study was to examine the associations between baseline electroencephalogram (EEG)-assessed brain oscillations and subsequent response to four neuromodulatory treatments. Based on available research, we hypothesized that baseline theta oscillations would prospectively predict response to hypnotic analgesia. Analyses involving other oscillations and the other treatments (meditation, neurofeedback, and both active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation) were viewed as exploratory, given the lack of previous research examining brain oscillations as predictors of response to these other treatments. Randomized controlled study of single sessions of four neuromodulatory pain treatments and a control procedure. Thirty individuals with spinal cord injury and chronic pain had their EEG recorded before each session of four active treatments (hypnosis, meditation, EEG biofeedback, transcranial direct current stimulation) and a control procedure (sham transcranial direct stimulation). As hypothesized, more presession theta power was associated with greater response to hypnotic analgesia. In exploratory analyses, we found that less baseline alpha power predicted pain reduction with meditation. The findings support the idea that different patients respond to different pain treatments and that between-person treatment response differences are related to brain states as measured by EEG. The results have implications for the possibility of enhancing pain treatment response by either 1) better patient/treatment matching or 2) influencing brain activity before treatment is initiated in order to prepare patients to respond. Research is needed to replicate and confirm the findings in additional samples of individuals with chronic pain.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Recent Insight on How the Neuroscientific Approach Helps Clinicians OBM Integrative and Complementary Medicine May 9, 2020
- Mindfulness Meditation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neurosurgery clinics of North America July 1, 2022
- Moderators of mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain: A test of the Limit, Activate and Enhance model. Journal of Pain 2019
Cites 5
- Neuromodulatory treatments for chronic pain: efficacy and mechanisms. Nature Reviews Neurology March 2014
- The effects of meditation-based interventions on the treatment of fibromyalgia. Current Pain and Headache Reports October 2012
- Theta activity and meditative states: spectral changes during concentrative meditation. Cognitive Processing February 2010
- Mindfulness-based stress reduction for chronic pain conditions: variation in treatment outcomes and role of home meditation practice. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 2010
- Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin March 2006