Continuity and Uniqueness of Consciousness: Logical Paradoxes and a Hypothesis of Additional Biophysical Degrees of Freedom
Kande Lekamalaya Senarath Dayathilake
October 6, 2025 DOI: 10.33774/coe-2025-t6pmb (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Uniqueness Consciousness Bridging networking Falsifiability Qualia Premise Thought experiment Information theory Epistemology Phenomenology philosophy Cognitive science Logical conjunction Compatibilism Logical consequence Arrow of time |
| Key points | Proposes that continuity and uniqueness of consciousness may depend on additional biophysical degrees of freedom beyond classical neural dynamics. |
Abstract
Consciousness remains one of the most profound unsolved problems in science, particularly regarding the persistence of a unique self across disruption, duplication, or time. Existing frameworks—Global Neuronal Workspace Theory (GNWT), Integrated Information Theory (IIT), and Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR)—describe mechanisms of awareness but fail to explain continuity and uniqueness of subjective identity. This paper integrates neuroscience, quantum biology, and philosophy through three thought experiments—brain revival, molecular reassembly, and synthetic replication—to expose logical paradoxes in current models. A new hypothesis is proposed: continuity and uniqueness of consciousness may depend on additional biophysical degrees of freedom beyond classical neural dynamics. The framework offers testable predictions for anesthesia, meditation, and quantum-coherence studies. By bridging empirical neuroscience and contemplative science, it provides a structured and falsifiable approach to one of nature’s deepest mysteries—the enduring continuity of consciousness.