The Structural Conditions of Subjecthood - A structural approach to minimal consciousness and subjecthood
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) May 5, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21102874 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDebates about consciousness, artificial intelligence, animal minds, and moral status often conflate distinct questions requiring different standards of explanation. This article distinguishes four such questions: subjectivity, moral patiency, personhood, and autonomous will. Current work has progressed on functional and phenomenological description, but a third task remains underdeveloped: a structural specification of the organisational conditions under which there is anything it is like to be a system. The article proposes a structural turn, asking what a system must be like for subjectivity to arise. Three provisional candidate conditions are introduced: dynamically maintained boundary, integrated field of co-present states, and self-referential global registration. Implications for artificial systems, animal consciousness, metaphysical neutrality, normativity, and borderline cases are considered.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Sketch Consciousness Subjectivity Conflation Field mathematics |
| Key finding | Proposes that a structural turn specifying organizational conditions for subjectivity is needed, and introduces three candidate conditions: dynamically maintained boundary, integrated field of co-present states, and self-referential global registration. |
Abstract
Debates about consciousness, artificial intelligence, animal minds, and moral status often conflate distinct questions that require different standards of explanation and assessment. This article distinguishes four such questions: subjectivity, moral patiency, personhood, and autonomous will. It argues that current work has made progress on two tasks—functional and phenomenological description—yet a third remains underdeveloped: a structural specification of the organisational conditions under which there is anything it is like to be a system at all. The article, therefore, proposes a structural turn. Rather than asking only what consciousness does or what experience feels like, it asks what a system must be like, in organisational terms, for subjectivity to arise. Three provisional candidate conditions are introduced—dynamically maintained boundary, integrated field of co-present states, and self-referential global registration—not as a finished theory, but as a sketch of the constraints. The paper then considers implications for artificial systems, animal consciousness, metaphysical neutrality, normativity, and borderline cases.