Emergence of qualia from brain activity or from an interaction of proto-consciousness with the brain: which one is the weirder? Available evidence and a research agenda
Patrizio Tressoldi, Enrico Facco, Daniela Lucangeli
ScienceOpen Research February 26, 2020 DOI: 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-socsci.ay054b.v1 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Compares two theories of consciousness to assess which better explains various qualia experiences and offers a more promising research agenda. |
Abstract
Abstract This contribution to the science of consciousness aims at comparing how two different theories can explain the emergence of different qualia experiences: meta-awareness, meta-cognition, the placebo effect, out-of-body experiences, cognitive therapy, meditation-induced brain changes, etc. The first theory postulates that qualia experiences derive from specific neural patterns, and the second one that qualia experiences derive from the interaction of a proto-consciousness with the brain’s neural activity. From this comparison, it will be possible to judge which one seems to better explain the different qualia experiences and to offer a more promising research agenda.
Citations in the library
Cites 17
- Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands The Lancet December 1, 2001
- Consciousness in the universe: a review of the 'Orch OR' theory. March 1, 2014
- Précis of the illusion of conscious will. Behavioral and Brain Sciences October 1, 2004
- The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex February 1, 2013
- Feeling the future: A meta-analysis of 90 experiments on the anomalous anticipation of random future events F1000Research January 29, 2016
and 12 more in the library