Emergence of qualia from brain activity or from an interaction of proto-consciousness with the brain: which one is the weirder? Available evidence and a research agenda
Patrizio Tressoldi, Enrico Facco, Daniela Lucangeli
ScienceOpen Research February 26, 2020 DOI: 10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-socsci.ay054b.v1 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractTwo theories of consciousness are compared for their ability to explain various qualia experiences, including meta-awareness, meta-cognition, the placebo effect, out-of-body experiences, cognitive therapy, and meditation-induced brain changes. One theory holds that qualia arise from specific neural patterns; the other posits that qualia result from the interaction of a proto-consciousness with brain activity. The comparison aims to determine which theory better accounts for these phenomena and offers a more promising research agenda.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Compares two theories of consciousness to assess which better explains various qualia experiences and offers a more promising research agenda. |
Abstract
Abstract This contribution to the science of consciousness aims at comparing how two different theories can explain the emergence of different qualia experiences: meta-awareness, meta-cognition, the placebo effect, out-of-body experiences, cognitive therapy, meditation-induced brain changes, etc. The first theory postulates that qualia experiences derive from specific neural patterns, and the second one that qualia experiences derive from the interaction of a proto-consciousness with the brain’s neural activity. From this comparison, it will be possible to judge which one seems to better explain the different qualia experiences and to offer a more promising research agenda.