Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Free will in Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference-driven endo-consciousness.

Yukio-Pegio Gunji, Mai Minoura, Kei Kojima, Yoichi Horry

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology December 1, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2017.06.018 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Linking consciousness and qualia to natural science may be possible by adopting an endo-perspective, which treats the external world as not directly perceived but only indirectly summoned, rather than an exo-perspective that treats it as directly operated. The difference between these perspectives corresponds not to Western versus Eastern cultures but to modernism versus animism. A causation-reversal pair—upward causation from premise to consequence and downward causation from consequence to premise—is modeled using Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference (BIB inference). Endo-consciousness is proposed as an agent equipped with BIB inference, which yields both efficient computations via Bayesian inference and robust computations via inverse Bayesian inference. Adapting the free will theorem to BIB inference suggests that endo-consciousness can explain free will as a regression of controllability of voluntary action.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Bayesian inference Consciousness Endo-physics Free will Internal measurement
Key finding Proposes that endo-consciousness, modeled by Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference, can link consciousness and qualia to natural science and explain free will as a regression of the controllability of voluntary action.

Abstract

How can we link challenging issues related to consciousness and/or qualia with natural science? The introduction of endo-perspective, instead of exo-perspective, as proposed by Matsuno, Rössler, and Gunji, is considered one of the most promising candidate approaches. Here, we distinguish the endo-from the exo-perspective in terms of whether the external is or is not directly operated. In the endo-perspective, the external can be neither perceived nor recognized directly; rather, one can only indirectly summon something outside of the perspective, which can be illustrated by a causation-reversal pair. On one hand, causation logically proceeds from the cause to the effect. On the other hand, a reversal from the effect to the cause is non-logical and is equipped with a metaphorical structure. We argue that the differences in exo- and endo-perspectives result not from the difference between Western and Eastern cultures, but from differences between modernism and animism. Here, a causation-reversal pair described using a pair of upward (from premise to consequence) and downward (from consequence to premise) causation and a pair of Bayesian and inverse Bayesian inference (BIB inference). Accordingly, the notion of endo-consciousness is proposed as an agent equipped with BIB inference. We also argue that BIB inference can yield both highly efficient computations through Bayesian interference and robust computations through inverse Bayesian inference. By adapting a logical model of the free will theorem to the BIB inference, we show that endo-consciousness can explain free will as a regression of the controllability of voluntary action.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment