Metaphysics of Soul, Universal Spirit, and Consciousness
International Journal of Jungian Studies February 19, 2025 DOI: 10.1163/19409060-bja10044 (opens in new tab)
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThis article critiques Jon Mills and Erik Goodwyn's 'Archetypal Origins' and their cosmopsychist framework for Jungian psychology. It argues that their treatment of matter and consciousness is problematic, particularly regarding agency and ontology. The author proposes an alternative ontological idealism that gives consciousness greater primacy, distinguishing between Universal Spirit as a non-local absolute consciousness and Soul as a localized projection within spacetime. This retains Goodwyn's themes of holism and formal cause while offering a different metaphysical grounding.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Proposes that Universal Spirit is non-local absolute consciousness and Soul is a localized projection within spacetime. |
Abstract
Abstract Jon Mills’ and Erik Goodwyn’s (2023) work Archetypal Origins establishes a foundation for ongoing dialogue about metaphysical origins for Jungian Psychology. This article explores tensions within their work, particularly concerning consciousness, agency, and the ontological status of matter. Examining Goodwyn’s cosmopsychism, it problematizes its treatment of matter and suggests an alternative framework. Retaining some of Goodwyn’s key themes of holism and formal cause, this variation of ontological idealism gives consciousness more primacy. The proposal suggests Universal Spirit as non-local absolute consciousness and Soul as a localized projection within the appearance of spacetime.