Kafka, paranoic doubles and the brain: hypnagogic vs. hyper-reflexive models of disrupted self in neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med August 20, 2010 DOI: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-13 (opens in new tab) via PubMed Central
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe paper compares two models of disrupted selfhood—hypnagogic and hyper-reflexive—drawing on Kafka's paranoic doubles to explore how self-disturbances manifest in neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states. It argues that hypnagogic models emphasize a passive, dream-like fragmentation of the self, while hyper-reflexive models highlight an excessive, self-conscious monitoring that disrupts normal experience. The analysis suggests that both frameworks offer complementary insights into conditions such as schizophrenia, depersonalization, and other altered states, and that Kafka's literary depictions of doubles provide a rich analogy for understanding these neuropsychiatric phenomena.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Proposes that hypnagogic and hyper-reflexive models of disrupted self, illustrated by Kafka's paranoic doubles, can inform understanding of neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states. |
Abstract
Kafka, paranoic doubles and the brain: hypnagogic vs. hyper-reflexive models of disrupted self in neuropsychiatric disorders and anomalous conscious states.