Skip to content

Visuoaffective day residue in hypnagogia involves sequential bihemispheric interactions between cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures.

George Vagner Souza, Natália Bezerra Mota, Allan Kardec Barros, Sidarta Ribeiro

Communications Biology July 4, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-08429-6 (opens in new tab)

Read Full Text
Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 28
Population Healthy participants
Intervention Affective visual images
Measures 64-channel EEG sources, functional connectivity analysis, semantic similarity between image and imagery reports, affect ratings
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Cerebellum Humans Electroencephalography Emotions Visual perception Wakefulness Sleep Female Young adult
Key findings Low-frequency EEG power was associated with weaker day residues and high-frequency power with stronger residues. Source networks correlated with imagetic and affective residues differed across wake-sleep states, partially overlapping with the default mode network during N1 for up to 50% and 61%, respectively. The authors propose that hypnagogic processing involves complex, dynamic, sequential bi-hemispheric interactions among cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures.

Abstract

The intricate interplay between visual perception and emotion determines how waking experience influences mentation through a 'day residue' at once conspicuous yet hard to predict. Here we set out to map the neural sources associated with the visuo-affective processing of the 'day residue' during hypnagogic sleep. To this end, we assessed 28 healthy participants on a combined nap protocol with serial awakenings, pre-sleep stimulation with affective visual images, yoked measures of the semantic similarity between image and imagery reports, affect ratings, estimation of 64-channel EEG sources, and functional connectivity analysis. Overall, low-frequency EEG power was associated with weaker residues, and high-frequency EEG power was associated with stronger residues. The source networks most significantly correlated with imagetic and affective residues were markedly different across wake-sleep states, partially overlapping with the default mode network during N1 for up to 50% and 61%, respectively. The results allowed us to identify neural correlates of the visuo-affective processing of the day's residue, showing that the hypnagogic processing of the waking experience involves complex, dynamic and sequential bi-hemispheric interactions among multiple cortical, subcortical, and cerebellar structures with visual, limbic, optokinetic, and cognitive functions.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance Young adults with a mean age of 20 years 2002 Prospective observational study n = 116
Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... 1987 Case-control study n = 11
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams 2004 Observational cohort n = 147
Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects 2018 Observational cohort n = 14

Citations in the library

Cited by 1

Cites 20

and 15 more in the library

Related reading

Explore topics

Dreaming Default mode network