The Discussion of Free Will and Neurodeterminism: Some Methodological Implications.
Integrative psychological & behavioral science February 15, 2026 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-026-09980-5 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical analysis and four empirical studies Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Native Russian and English speakers |
| Keywords | Compatibilism Consciousness Free will Linguistic intuition Methodological analysis Neurodeterminism |
| Key points | Argues that free will can coexist with action predictability, as participants consistently interpreted consciously performed actions as free regardless of predictability. |
Abstract
This article critically examines the fundamental tenets of neurodeterminism in the discussion of free will, focusing on three key methodological issues: the personification of the brain as an independent actor, the assumed direct correspondence between neural processes and mental states, and the relationship between action predictability and free will. Through a comprehensive theoretical analysis and four empirical studies involving native Russian and English speakers, the research challenges the neurodeterministic perspective. The studies reveal that, at the level of basic linguistic intuition, free will can coexist with action predictability. Participants consistently interpreted actions as free when they were consciously performed, regardless of their predictability. The research highlights that a necessary condition for discussing free will is conscious awareness of the action, with bodily movements outside conscious control not being considered free.