What physics offers for artificial intelligence? Lessons from the brain's inner time and its dynamics.
Georg Northoff, Yasir Çatal, Samira Abbasi
Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences May 14, 2026 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2025.0005 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractComputing can learn from physics by conceiving time in terms of dynamics—changing patterns of activity over time. The brain's intrinsic neural dynamics, specifically its spontaneous activity, scale-free activity, and variability, enable it to actively participate in the world's physical time through processes like entrainment, where neural activity follows external rhythms such as music. This active participation shapes experience and consciousness. Current computing devices, whether classical or natural, lack spontaneous activity and an 'inner time' that can actively influence processing. Consequently, they cannot actively encode input dynamics or participate in the world's physical time, leaving them 'locked out of time and world' and unable to acquire tacit knowledge or behave flexibly in a changing world.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Artificial intelligence ai Brain Scale-free dynamics Spontaneous activity Variability |
| Key finding | Argues that current computing devices lack spontaneous activity and an inner time, preventing them from actively processing input dynamics or participating in the world's physical time, unlike humans. |
Abstract
Computing can take advantage of physics-that is, 'whatever physics offers' (Jaeger et al. 2023 Nat. Commun. 14, 4911 (doi:10.1038/s41467-023-40533-1)). One of the key features physics provides is time: it describes rules and makes predictions about how activity patterns change over time, as governed by dynamics. We argue that computing can learn from physics in how it conceives time-namely, in terms of dynamics, i.e. the changing patterns of activity unfolding over time. In particular, we focus on the brain's intrinsic neural dynamics of spontaneous activity and how it 'uses' them for dynamic input processing and encoding in order to 'participate' in the world's physical time. By 'participate', we mean becoming part of the input dynamics: for instance, when listening or dancing to music, neural activity (via entrainment) and, consequently, mental activity follows the rhythm and dynamics of the music. This shapes the listener's experience, such as consciousness-the brain, and thus the subject, actively participates in music rhythms through temporal alignment (Northoff et al. 2023 Interface Focus13, 20220076 (doi:10.1098/rsfs.2022.0076)). Drawing on recent empirical evidence, we show that dynamic features such as the brain's scale-free activity and variability-which reflect an intrinsic temporal structure, or the brain's 'inner time'-are central to tracking and encoding input dynamics. Importantly, this processing is actively modulated rather than passively received, through the brain's own 'hidden dynamic repertoire'. Extending earlier discussions by Dreyfus and others, we argue that current computing devices, whether classical or natural (i.e. non-von Neumann machines), lack spontaneous activity and an inner time that can exert an active, rather than purely passive, influence on processing. As a result, they can neither actively process and encode input dynamics through their own inner time, nor 'use' or 'participate' in the dynamics of the world's physical time. Instead of 'being in time' and 'being in the world', current computing devices-and, by extension, artificial intelligence-are effectively 'locked out of time and world', meaning they are not directly connected to physical time. Unlike humans, they therefore cannot be characterized as 'being in time' or 'being in the world', which in turn prevents them from acquiring tacit or implicit knowledge, including the ability to navigate and behave flexibly within a continuously changing world. This article is part of the theme issue 'World models in natural and artificial intelligence'.