Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Dynamic Integrated Consciousness Theory

Arikan, Furkan

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) June 7, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18913517 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A review proposes Dynamic Integrated Consciousness Theory (DIC) to explain why some monitoring becomes reportable awareness while other monitoring remains local or behavior-guiding. DIC separates five typed burdens: organized self-reference (C1), global availability (C2), within-episode renewal (C3), competition-sensitive commitment (C4), and reflexive policy modeling over the selector itself (C5). Basic functional awareness requires a C1-C4-positive profile plus time-bounded co-occurrence of online self-indexing and long-range broadcast. Meta-conscious awareness adds selector-level revision of why the current selection policy produced the chosen content. The review licenses each burden through paired healthy/intact and damaged/perturbed evidence, presenting DIC as a falsifiable mechanistic scaffold rather than a metaphysics of phenomenal feel.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Keywords Blindsight Falsifiability Qualia Dimension graph theory Permutation music
Key finding The Dynamic Integrated Consciousness Theory proposes that basic functional awareness requires a C1-C4-positive profile plus time-bounded co-occurrence of online self-indexing and long-range broadcast, while meta-conscious awareness adds selector-level revision.

Abstract

Abstract Why does some monitoring become reportable awareness while other monitoring remains local or behaviour-guiding? Dynamic Integrated Consciousness Theory (DIC) synthesizes evidence from intact, lesioned, perturbed, anaesthetized, sleep-state, and disorders-of-consciousness studies into a mechanistic scaffold for this transition. It separates five typed burdens: organized self-reference (C1), global availability (C2), within-episode renewal (C3), competition-sensitive commitment (C4), and reflexive policy modelling over the selector itself (C5; “rapid causality” is retained only as historical shorthand). Basic functional awareness is proposed to require a C1-C4-positive profile plus time-bounded co-occurrence of online self-indexing and long-range broadcast. Meta-conscious awareness adds selector-level revision of why the current selection policy produced the chosen content. The review licenses each burden through paired healthy/intact and damaged/perturbed evidence where available, and presents DIC as a falsifiable mechanistic scaffold rather than as a metaphysics of phenomenal feel. The accompanying open-data package translates the hypotheses into auditable pilot tests.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment