Skip to content

Intrinsic Rivalry. Can White Bears Help Us With the Other Side of Consciousness?

Marek Havlík, Eva Kozáková, Jiřı́ Horáček

Frontiers in Psychology May 10, 2019 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01087 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Hypothesis and theory article with proof-of-concept study Peer reviewed
Keywords Rivalry Consciousness White mutation Great rift Cognitive psychology Psychoanalysis
Citations 4
Key points Intrinsic conscious experiences are neglected in consciousness research due to methodological challenges and a lack of paradigms, but a proposed new paradigm modeled on perceptual studies could enable their systematic investigation.

Abstract

Studies of consciousness have traditionally been based mainly upon the perceptual domains of consciousness. However, there is another side of consciousness, represented by various types of intrinsic conscious experiences. Even though intrinsic experiences can represent up to 50 percent of our conscious experiences, they are still largely neglected in conscious studies. We assume there are two reasons for this. Firstly, the field of intrinsic conscious experiences is methodologically far more problematic than any other. Secondly, specific paradigms for capturing the correlates of intrinsic conscious experiences are almost non-existent. Nevertheless, we expect the intrinsic side of consciousness to soon take its place in conscious studies, but first new experimental paradigms will have to be devised, which would be of a similar design to the paradigms used in studies of perceptual consciousness. In this hypothesis and theory article, we propose such a hypothetical paradigm, present the exploratory data of our proof-of-concept study, discuss its use, and address its shortcomings and their possible remediation.