Skip to content

Relative effectiveness of augmentation treatments for treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Ben Carter, Rebecca Strawbridge, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Brett D. M. Jones, Roxanna Short, Anthony J. Cleare, Dimosthenis Tsapekos, Fiona Patrick, Lindsey Marwood, R. Taylor, Tim Mantingh, Valeria de Angel, Viktoriya L. Nikolova, André F. Carvalho, Allan H. Young

International Review of Psychiatry June 5, 2020 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1765748 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and network meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Adults meeting common clinical criteria for treatment-resistant depression
Interventions antipsychotics mood stabilizers NMDA-targeting medications
Topics Depression
Keywords Meta-analysis Placebo Depression economics Clinical trial Randomized controlled trial Psychological intervention Mood Systematic review Medline Alternative medicine
Citations 45
Key findings NMDA-targeting medications are markedly superior to placebo and have the highest chance of being an effective augmentation treatment for treatment-resistant depression.

Abstract

Most interventions for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are added as augmenters. We aimed to determine the relative effectiveness of augmentation treatments for TRD. This systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) sought all randomized trials of pharmacological and psychological augmentation interventions for adults meeting the most common clinical criteria for TRD. The NMA compared the intervention effectiveness of depressive symptoms for TRD augmentation. Of 36 included trials, 27 were suitable for inclusion in NMA, and no psychological trials could be included in the absence of a common comparator. Antipsychotics (13 trials), mood stabilizers (three trials), NMDA-targeting medications (five trials), and other mechanisms (3 trials) were compared against placebo. NMDA treatments were markedly superior to placebo (ES = 0.91, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.16) and head-to-head NMA suggested that NMDA therapies had the highest chance of being an effective treatment option compared to other pharmacological classes. This study provides the most comprehensive evidence of augmenters' effectiveness for TRD, and our GRADE recommendations can be used to guide guidelines to optimize treatment choices. Although conclusions are limited by paucity of, and heterogeneity between, trials as well as inconsistent reports of treatment safety. This work supports the use of NMDA-targeting medications such as ketamine.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Cited by 5

Cites 4

Explore topics