Algorithmic structure of experience and the unfolding argument
Giulio Ruffini, Edmundo Lopez-Sola, Jakub Vohryzek
August 30, 2022 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/7nbsw (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe unfolding argument challenges causal structure theories of consciousness by requiring that a theory specify which physical systems are conscious and which are not. This paper examines how the algorithmic information theory of consciousness (KT), which links subjective experience to the structure of a computational system, is affected by this argument. Considering computational hierarchies and limited physical resources, the authors introduce novel considerations that may extend the unfolding argument, suggesting that the argument's requirements may be more complex when applied to theories that rely on algorithmic information and computational structure.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Argument complex analysis Consciousness Point geometry Computer science Epistemology |
| Citations | 3 |
| Key finding | Proposes that examining computational hierarchies and limited physical resources yields new considerations for the unfolding argument against causal structure theories of consciousness. |
Abstract
Here we discuss the impact of issues recently raised about theories of consciousness in light of the so-called "unfolding argument" and the more general falsification requirements on causal structure theories of consciousness. These arguments potentially affect the algorithmic information theory of consciousness (KT), where the structure of a computational system is seen to shape subjective experience. We discuss this from the point of view of computational hierarchies and limited physical resources to point to some novel considerations in the unfolding argument and its extensions.