Neural correlates of consciousness and the nature of the mind
Consciousness and the Ontology of Properties January 1, 2018 DOI: 10.4324/9781315104706-15 (opens in new tab) via Elsevier
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractNeural correlates of consciousness (NCC) are often taken as strong evidence for physicalism, the view that the mind is entirely physical. This chapter argues that NCC are neutral between physicalism and dualism. It clarifies what NCC are and how neuroscientists identify them, then explains that concluding physicalism from NCC requires additional philosophical argumentation, not just neuroscientific data. The simplicity argument for physicalism that appeals to NCC is presented, analyzed, and found wanting, meaning it does not successfully support physicalism over dualism.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that neural correlates of consciousness are neutral regarding physicalist and dualist views of the mind, and that the simplicity argument for physicalism based on NCC is flawed. |
Abstract
It is often thought that contemporary neuroscience provides strong evidence for physicalism that nullifies dualism. The principal data is neural correlates of consciousness (for brevity NCC). In this chapter I argue that NCC are neutral vis- à-vis physicalist and dualist views of the mind. First I clarify what NCC are and how neuroscientists identify them. Subsequently I discuss what NCC entail and highlight the need for philosophical argumentation in order to conclude that physicalism is true by appealing to NCC. Lastly, the simplicity argument for physicalism that appeals to NCC is presented, analyzed, and found wanting.