Skip to content

Predicting non-response to ketamine for depression: An exploratory symptom-level analysis of real-world data among military veterans.

Eric A. Miller, Houtan Totonchi Afshar, Jyoti Mishra, Roger S McIntyre, Dhakshin Ramanathan

Psychiatry Research May 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115858 (opens in new tab)

The journal has published a correction to this paper. Read the correction (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective analysis Peer reviewed
Sample size 120
Population Adults with treatment-resistant depression who received intravenous racemic ketamine or intranasal esketamine in a real-world clinic
Intervention intravenous racemic ketamine
Topics Esketamine Ketamine Depression
Keywords Predictive modeling Symptom trajectories Treatment resistant depression Treatment-resistant depression trd Refractory depression Predictive analytics Medical forecasting Veterans mental health
Citations 12
Key points Using baseline symptoms alone, a logistic regression classifier identified 22% of patients who would not respond to ketamine or esketamine with a negative predictive value over 96%.

Abstract

Ketamine helps some patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD), but reliable methods for predicting which patients will, or will not, respond to treatment are lacking. Herein, we aim to inform prediction models of non-response to ketamine/esketamine in adults with TRD. This is a retrospective analysis of PHQ-9 item response data from 120 patients with TRD who received repeated doses of intravenous racemic ketamine or intranasal eskatamine in a real-world clinic. Regression models were fit to patients' symptom trajectories, showing that all symptoms improved on average, but depressed mood improved relatively faster than low energy. Principal component analysis revealed a first principal component (PC) representing overall treatment response, and a second PC that reflects variance across affective versus somatic symptom subdomains. We then trained logistic regression classifiers to predict overall response (improvement on PC1) better than chance using patients' baseline symptoms alone. Finally, by parametrically adjusting the classifier decision thresholds, we identified optimal models for predicting non-response with a negative predictive value of over 96 %, while retaining a specificity of 22 %. Thus, we could identify 22 % of patients who would not respond based purely on their baseline symptoms. This approach could inform rational treatment recommendations to avoid additional treatment failures.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Cited by 9

and 4 more in the library

Cites 15

and 10 more in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice