Bridging dream and wake states: a new tool for consciousness research.
Zeynep Temel Başer, Gülsüm Uzer, Hansa Şentürk, Ali Yalçınkaya, Tuba İkbal Yayla, Merve Dikmen, Halil Aziz Velioğlu, Erol Yıldırım, Lutfu Hanoglu
Neuroscience of Consciousness 2026 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niag038 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Instrument development and validation study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 432 |
| Population | Online participants |
| Keywords | Rem sleep Dream consciousness Phenomenology of consciousness Self-report instrument Waking consciousness |
| Key points | The CSCS-REM is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument that enables systematic comparison of REM dream consciousness and waking consciousness across eight shared phenomenological dimensions. |
Abstract
In this study, the Consciousness States Comparison Scale: REM Version (CSCS-REM) was developed as a self-report instrument to assess dream consciousness during REM sleep in comparison with waking consciousness. Existing instruments capture only limited aspects of phenomenology and provide few opportunities for systematic cross-state evaluation. By anchoring waking consciousness as a reference point, the CSCS-REM quantifies relative differences in phenomenological experience and serves as a tool for empirically testing the predictions of the continuity and discontinuity hypotheses in consciousness research. The item pool was derived from a systematic review, expert evaluations, and preliminary studies, with content validity ensured through expert panels. After pilot testing, the 63-item draft was administered online, and data from 432 participants were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. The final version consisted of 35 items across eight subscales: Metacognitive Awareness, Cognitive Fluency, Memory, Temporal Awareness, Spatial Awareness, Emotional Awareness, Perceptual and Bodily Senses, and Interoceptive and Chemical Senses. This structure accounted for 56.04% of the variance, with Cronbach's α ranging from .736 to .915 and McDonald's ω from .639 to .901. Confirmatory factor analysis in an independent sample (n = 211) demonstrated excellent fit indices (Comparative Fit Index = .986, Tucker-Lewis Index = .984, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = .059). Subscales of the CSCS-REM showed small to moderate, yet significant, correlations with the Bodily Self-Consciousness in Dreams Questionnaire and the Dream Reflective Awareness Questionnaire, supporting convergent validity. In conclusion, while subject to some limitations, the CSCS-REM is a psychometrically reliable and valid instrument that enables systematic comparison of REM dream consciousness and waking consciousness across shared phenomenological dimensions.
Citations in the library
Cites 48
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- The default-mode, ego-functions and free-energy: a neurobiological account of Freudian ideas Brain February 28, 2010
- Unresponsiveness ≠ Unconsciousness Anesthesiology February 7, 2012
- Psychobiology of Altered States of Consciousness. Psychological Bulletin 2005
- Dreaming as mind wandering: evidence from functional neuroimaging and first-person content reports. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2013
and 43 more in the library