Skip to content

Efficacy and safety of dextromethorphan-bupropion combination (AXS-05) in the treatment of depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

J V Ashwin, Mohit Kumar Shahi, Astha Singh, S Theepan Kumar

Indian Journal of Pharmacology July 1, 2025 DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_907_24 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Network meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Adults aged 18-65 with major depressive disorder
Intervention dextromethorphan-bupropion combination
Topics Depression
Keywords Axs-05 Bupropion Dextromethorphan Efficacy
Key findings The dextromethorphan-bupropion combination (AXS-05) showed superior efficacy over bupropion alone and placebo, with remission rates of 46.5% and 39.5% versus 16.2% and 17.3%, respectively.

Abstract

This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of the dextromethorphan-bupropion combination (AXS-05) in treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Data were retrieved from multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and ClinicalKey, yielding 60 records. After removing duplicates and excluding irrelevant studies, such as reviews, case reports, posters, and studies focusing on unrelated populations (e.g., Alzheimer's dementia), two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) - Tabuteau et al. (2022) and Iosifescu et al. (2022) - were selected for final analysis. The inclusion criteria focused on RCTs published between 2014 and 2024, involving adult participants (18-65 years) diagnosed with MDD, and reporting on the efficacy and safety of the dextromethorphan-bupropion combination. Studies that did not focus on MDD, were not in English, or lacked control groups were excluded. The findings indicate superior efficacy of the dextromethorphan-bupropion combination, with remission rates of 46.5% and 39.5%, compared to 16.2% for Bupropion alone and 17.3% for placebo. Despite a higher incidence of mild to moderate adverse events (72.9% vs. 64.6% for Bupropion), the combination's safety profile remained comparable, with no significant increase in treatment discontinuation. These results suggest that AXS-05 is a promising treatment for MDD, warranting further investigation in larger, diverse populations to confirm its long-term efficacy and safety.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Explore topics