Choice of nitrous oxide and its subjective effects in light and moderate drinkers.
James P Zacny, Diana J Walker, Lindsay M Derus
Drug and Alcohol Dependence November 1, 2008 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.06.001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Experimental study with within-subjects sampling and choice procedure Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 32 |
| Population | Moderate drinkers and light drinkers |
| Intervention | Nitrous oxide |
| Dose | 0%, 20%, 30%, 40% concentrations |
| Duration | Four 3.5-hour sessions |
| Key findings | Moderate drinkers chose nitrous oxide significantly more times than placebo and more times than light drinkers, and reported greater abuse-liability-related subjective effects at 20% and 30% concentrations. |
Abstract
Alcohol-drinking status has been shown to modulate the reinforcing and subjective effects of a number of drugs. We have previously published two studies on the modulating effects of alcohol-drinking status on choice for, and subjective effects of, nitrous oxide, but the results were equivocal. Using a methodology different from our previous studies, we sought to determine in a more definitive fashion the degree to which the choice of nitrous oxide and its subjective effects were modulated by drinking status. Four concentrations of nitrous oxide (0, 20, 30, and 40%) were administered to 16 moderate drinkers (MDs) and 16 light drinkers (LDs) across four 3.5-h sessions. During experimental sessions, subjects first completed two 10-min sampling trials in which one of the nitrous oxide concentrations and placebo (100% oxygen) were inhaled. Subjective and psychomotor tests were given 5min into each sampling trial. During the subsequent choice period, subjects were allowed to choose what they wanted to inhale (drug, placebo, or "drug-free air") on nine contiguous 5-min choice trials. Choice of nitrous oxide was modulated by drinking status: MDs but not LDs chose nitrous oxide significantly more times than placebo, and MDs also chose nitrous oxide significantly more times than did LDs. At each active nitrous oxide concentration, MDs reported more abuse liability-related subjective effects, especially at the 20% and 30% concentrations. The results of the present study provide more conclusive evidence that choice as well as subjective effects of nitrous oxide is modulated by alcohol-drinking status.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Characterization of the discriminative stimulus effects of nitrous oxide VCU Scholars Compass 2014
- Rewarding Subjective Effects of the NMDAR Antagonist Nitrous Oxide (Laughing Gas) Are Moderated by Impulsivity and Depressive Symptoms in Healthy Volunteers. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology July 23, 2021
- Discriminative stimulus effects of nitrous oxide in mice: comparison with volatile hydrocarbons and vapor anesthetics. Behavioural Pharmacology February 1, 2014
Cites 5
- Analysis of the reinforcing and subjective effects of different doses of nitrous oxide using a free-choice procedure. Drug and Alcohol Dependence March 1, 2002
- Lack of effects of ethanol pretreatment on the abuse liability of nitrous oxide in light and moderate drinkers. Addiction December 1, 2001
- Within- and between-subject variability in the reinforcing and subjective effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence September 1, 2001
- The effects of alcohol history on the reinforcing, subjective and psychomotor effects of nitrous oxide in healthy volunteers. Drug and Alcohol Dependence April 14, 1997
- Reinforcing effects of extended inhalation of nitrous oxide in humans. Drug and Alcohol Dependence February 1, 1993