Skip to content

Effects of haloperidol on the delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol response in humans: a responder analysis.

Swapnil Gupta, Joao P De Aquino, Deepak C D'Souza, Mohini Ranganathan

Psychopharmacology September 1, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s00213-019-05235-x (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject experimental study Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Healthy individuals who responded to THC (increase of at least one point on PANSS positive scale)
Interventions Haloperidol Δ-9-THC
Dose 0.057 mg/kg oral haloperidol; 0.0286 mg/kg intravenous Δ-9-THC
Duration Two test days, with THC administered 90 and 215 minutes after haloperidol
Measures Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinician-Administered Dissociative Symptom Scale (CADSS)
Topics Cannabis
Keywords Antipsychotic Cannabinoid Dopamine Haloperidol Psychosis
Key findings Haloperidol pre-treatment reduced THC-induced increases in PANSS positive scores in THC responders.

Abstract

Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ-9-THC) produces psychotomimetic effects in humans. However, the role of dopamine signaling in producing such effects is unclear. We hypothesized that dopaminergic antagonism would reduce the psychotomimetic effect of Δ-9-THC. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether pre-treatment with haloperidol would alter the psychotomimetic and perceptual-altering effects of Δ-9-THC, measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS) and the Clinician-Administered Dissociative Symptom Scale (CADSS) in humans. In a two-test-day double-blind study, 28 healthy individuals were administered with active (0.057 mg/kg) or placebo oral haloperidol, followed 90 and 215 min later by intravenous administration of active (0.0286 mg/kg) Δ-9-THC and placebo, respectively. This secondary analysis was conducted because of the observation in other studies and in our data that a significant proportion of individuals may not have an adequate response to THC (floor effect), thus limiting the ability to test an interaction. Therefore, this analysis was performed including only responders to THC (n = 10), defined as individuals who had an increase of at least one point on the PANSS positive scale, consistent with prior human laboratory studies. In the 10 responders, Δ-9-THC-induced increases in PANSS positive scores were significantly lower in the haloperidol condition (1.1 + 0.35) compared with the placebo condition (2.9 + 0.92). This responder analysis showed that haloperidol did reduce the psychotomimetic effect of Δ-9-THC, supporting the hypothesis that dopaminergic signaling may participate in the psychosis-like effects of cannabinoids.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 48
Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... 2009 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial n = 15
Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers Healthy male subjects 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 16
Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... 2009 Randomized controlled trial n = 15
Cannabidiol (CBD) content in vaporized cannabis does not prevent tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-induced impairment of driving and cognition Healthy volunteers with a history of light cannabis use 2019 Randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover n = 14

Citations in the library

Explore topics