Skip to content

Age-related differences in the impact of cannabis use on the brain and cognition: a systematic review

Claire M. Gorey, Lauren Kuhns, Eleni Smaragdi, Emese Kroon, Janna Cousijn

European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience January 24, 2019 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-019-00981-7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Topics Cannabis
Keywords Effects of cannabis Cognition Abstinence Developmental psychology Psychological resilience Clinical psychology Vulnerability computing
Citations 118
Key findings The review does not offer a conclusive answer on the moderating role of age but generates hypotheses that general executive functioning is more impaired in adolescent frequent cannabis users, age effects may be strongest among very heavy users, craving and inhibitory control may persist more in adolescents post-intoxication, and learning deficits may not persist after sustained abstinence in adolescents.

Abstract

The impact of cannabis on the adolescent compared to adult brain is of interest to researchers and society alike. From a theoretical perspective, adolescence represents a period of both risk and resilience to the harms of cannabis use and cannabis use disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a critical examination of the moderating role of age on the relationship between cannabis use and cognition. To this end, we reviewed human and animal studies that formally tested whether age, adolescent or adult, changes the relationship between cannabis exposure and cognitive outcomes. While the results of this review do not offer a conclusive answer on the role of age, the novel review question, along with the inclusion of both human and animal work, has allowed for the formation of new hypotheses to be addressed in future work. First, general executive functioning seems to be more impaired in adolescent frequent cannabis users compared to adult frequent cannabis users. Second, age-effects may be most prominent among very heavy and dependent users. Third, craving and inhibitory control may not decrease as much post-intoxication in adolescents compared to adults. Lastly, adolescents' vulnerability to reduced learning following cannabis use may not persist after sustained abstinence. If these hypotheses prove correct, it could lead to important developments in policy and prevention efforts.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Effects of cannabis use on outcomes of psychotic disorders: systematic review People with psychotic disorders, as examined in 13 longitudinal studies 2008 Systematic review
The Impact of Cannabis Use on Cognitive Functioning in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Existing Findings and New Data in a First-Episode Sample Patients with established schizophrenia (meta-analysis: 572) and patients with... 2010 Meta-analysis and cross-sectional observational study n = 700
Medicinal cannabis for psychiatric disorders: a clinically-focused systematic review 2020 Systematic review
Neuroimaging in cannabis use: a systematic review of the literature Cannabis users and controls in neuroimaging studies 2009 Systematic review
Human Laboratory Studies on Cannabinoids and Psychosis. Healthy human subjects and individuals with schizophrenia 2016 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 18

and 13 more in the library

Cites 14

and 9 more in the library

Explore topics