Skip to content

Cognitive mechanisms in cannabis-related paranoia; Initial testing and model proposal

Katherine Newman‐Taylor, Thomas Richardson, Monica Sood, Mat Sopp, Emma Perry, Helen Bolderston

Psychosis May 13, 2020 DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2020.1757742 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study (three linked studies) Peer reviewed
Population General population sample (Study 1 and 2) and clinical population of people with psychosis (Study 3)
Topics Cannabis
Keywords Paranoia Attribution Schizotypy Cognition Population Psychosis Distress Clinical psychology Sexual abuse Schizophrenia object-oriented programming Poison control Injury prevention
Citations 18
Key findings External attribution and cognitive fusion partially or fully account for the impact of established risk factors on cannabis-related paranoia and psychotic-type experiences.

Abstract

Cannabis use can increase severity of symptoms and risk of relapse for people with psychosis. Childhood sexual abuse and high schizotypy increase the risk further. The mechanisms involved remain unclear, and this limits psychological therapies. In three linked studies, we examined the role of two candidate mechanisms – external attribution and cognitive fusion. Study 1 examined these processes in a general population sample and showed that paranoia, psychotic-type experiences, and linked distress were higher in cannabis-users, and mediated by cognitive fusion but not external attribution. Study 2 examined the impact of established risk factors in general population cannabis-users and showed that external attribution and cognitive fusion partially or fully accounted for the effects of childhood sexual abuse and schizotypy on paranoia, psychotic-type experiences and linked distress. Study 3 examined these same processes in a clinical population of people with psychosis and found that external attribution and cognitive fusion partially or fully accounted for the impact of gender, age of first use, sexual abuse and schizotypy. External attribution and cognitive fusion may be key mechanisms in the maintenance of cannabis-related paranoia and account for the impact of established risk factors. We present a cognitive model incorporating these processes to inform clinical practice.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on cannabis, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabis use before age 15 and subsequent executive functioning 104 chronic cannabis users (49 early-onset before age 15, 55 late-onset after age 15)... 2011 Observational cross-sectional study n = 148
Patterns of simultaneous polysubstance use in drug using university students Drug-using university students 2006 Cross-sectional survey n = 149
Persisting Reductions in Cannabis, Opioid, and Stimulant Misuse After Naturalistic Psychedelic Use: An Online Survey Online survey respondents 2020 Cross-sectional survey
User perceptions of the benefits and harms of hallucinogenic drug use: A web-based questionnaire study Users of hallucinogenic drugs who completed a web-based questionnaire 2010 Cross-sectional survey n = 600
Illicit Use of LSD or Psilocybin, but not MDMA or Nonpsychedelic Drugs, is Associated with Mystical Experiences in a Dose-Dependent Manner Adults recruited from the MAPS website and newsletter, most reporting use of various... 2012 Cross-sectional survey n = 337

Citations in the library

Explore topics