Comments on "Does paranormal perception occur in near-death experiences?"
The Journal of near-death studies January 1, 2007 DOI: 10.17514/jnds-2007-25-4-p237-244. (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA response to Keith Augustine's critique argues that his objections to studies of veridical perception in near-death experiences rely on speculation from popular media rather than on data or peer-reviewed research. However, addressing the methodological issues he raises could improve near-death research and strengthen the evidence for veridical perception.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Paranormal Perception Speculation Social psychology Alternative medicine |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | Augustine's critique is based on unsubstantiated speculation, not supportive data or peer-reviewed literature. |
Abstract
Keith Augustine's critique of studies of veridical perception in near-death experiences is based on unsubstantiated speculation from the popular media, rather than on supportive data or peer-reviewed literature. Nevertheless, addressing the issues he raises would improve the methodology of near-death research and strengthen the evidential database for veridical perception.