Skip to content

The acute effects of cannabidiol on the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback in healthy volunteers

Will Lawn, J. P. Hill, Chandni Hindocha, Jocelyn Ll Yim, Yumeya Yamamori, Gus Jones, Hannah Walker, Sebastian F Green, Matthew B. Wall, Oliver Howes, Helen Valerie Curran, Tom P. Freeman, Michael Bloomfield

Journal of Psychopharmacology August 5, 2020 DOI: 10.1177/0269881120944148 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures design Peer reviewed
Sample size 23
Population Healthy participants
Intervention Cannabidiol
Dose 600 mg
Topics Cannabis CBD
Keywords Anticipation artificial intelligence Incentive salience Placebo Insula Cognition
Citations 23
Key points Cannabidiol did not acutely alter brain activity associated with reward anticipation or feedback in healthy participants.

Abstract

Background: Cannabidiol has potential therapeutic benefits for people with psychiatric disorders characterised by reward function impairment. There is existing evidence that cannabidiol may influence some aspects of reward processing. However, it is unknown whether cannabidiol acutely affects brain function underpinning reward anticipation and feedback. HYPOTHESES: We predicted that cannabidiol would augment brain activity associated with reward anticipation and feedback.

Methods: We administered a single 600 mg oral dose of cannabidiol and matched placebo to 23 healthy participants in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, repeated-measures design. We employed the monetary incentive delay task during functional magnetic resonance imaging to assay the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback. We conducted whole brain analyses and region-of-interest analyses in pre-specified reward-related brain regions.

Results: The monetary incentive delay task elicited expected brain activity during reward anticipation and feedback, including in the insula, caudate, nucleus accumbens, anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex. However, across the whole brain, we did not find any evidence that cannabidiol altered reward-related brain activity. Moreover, our Bayesian analyses showed that activity in our regions-of-interest was similar following cannabidiol and placebo. Additionally, our behavioural measures of motivation for reward did not show a significant difference between cannabidiol and placebo.

Discussion: Cannabidiol did not acutely affect the neural correlates of reward anticipation and feedback in healthy participants. Future research should explore the effects of cannabidiol on different components of reward processing, employ different doses and administration regimens, and test its reward-related effects in people with psychiatric disorders.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on CBD, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Cannabidiol inhibits THC-elicited paranoid symptoms and hippocampal-dependent memory impairment Healthy participants 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 48
Distinct Effects of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol on Neural Activation During Emotional Processing Healthy, English-native, right-handed men who had used cannabis 15 times or less in... 2009 Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover trial n = 15
Inverted U-Shaped Dose-Response Curve of the Anxiolytic Effect of Cannabidiol during Public Speaking in Real Life Healthy subjects aged 18 to 35 years 2017 Randomized controlled trial n = 60
Acute Effects of a Single, Oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and Cannabidiol (CBD) Administration in Healthy Volunteers Healthy male subjects 2012 Randomized controlled trial n = 16
Modulation of Mediotemporal and Ventrostriatal Function in Humans by Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Healthy, native English-speaking, right-handed men of white race/ethnicity who had used... 2009 Randomized controlled trial n = 15

Citations in the library

Explore topics