Skip to content

Mindfulness-based interventions for student coping in higher education: a systematic review

Shameen Naidu, Nicolette V. Roman

Advances in Mental Health July 10, 2026 DOI: 10.1080/18387357.2026.2692478 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 35
Population Students in higher education
Topics Anxiety Meditation
Keywords Psychological intervention Mental health Coping psychology Systematic review Higher education Applied psychology Medical education Clinical psychology Project commissioning
Key findings Mindfulness-based interventions show promise in reducing stress, anxiety, and depression while improving emotional regulation and academic focus, but face limitations including geographic bias, homogeneous samples, and lack of long-term follow-ups.

Abstract

Objective Students in higher education (HE) increasingly experience challenging concerns from stress to anxiety and depression. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) became a popular strategy to help students cope with these. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy, scalability and sustainability of various MBIs implemented in HE to identify strengths, limitations and possible future directions for student wellbeing.Method Nine databases were searched from 2012–2024, with 35 studies reviewed. These were analysed using the RE-AIM framework.Results Findings highlight MBIs promise in reducing stress, anxiety, and depression while improving emotional regulation and academic focus. Key strengths include institutional adoption, and delivery by qualified practitioners. Limitations related to geographic bias, homogeneity in samples, methodological shortcomings, and a lack of long-term follow-ups. Recruitment strategies often excluded marginalised groups.Discussion This review underscores MBIs’ potential as a tool for student wellbeing and highlights the need for equitable and context-sensitive interventions to address global higher education mental health challenges in support of academic success. Recommendations emphasise diversifying participant demographics, integrating MBIs within programmes, and employing longitudinal, user-centred designs for scalability and sustainability.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics