Skip to content

Features of Dissociation Differentially Predict Antidepressant Response to Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression

Mark J. Niciu, Bridget J. Shovestul, Brittany A. Jaso, Cristan A Farmer, D. Luckenbaugh, Nancy E. Brutsché, Lawrence T. Park, Elizabeth D. Ballard, Carlos A. Zarate

Journal of Affective Disorders February 17, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.049 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Follow-up study with confirmatory factor analysis and general linear model Peer reviewed
Sample size 126
Population Treatment-resistant patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar disorder
Intervention Ketamine
Dose 0.5 mg/kg
Measures Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
Topics Depression Esketamine Ketamine
Citations 134
Key points Depersonalization was positively related to antidepressant response across all studies and timepoints, while derealization showed a significant effect at only one timepoint in one study, and amnesia was unrelated.

Abstract

Background: Ketamine induces rapid and robust antidepressant effects, and many patients also describe dissociation, which is associated with antidepressant response. This follow-up study investigated whether antidepressant efficacy is uniquely related to dissociative symptom clusters.

Methods: Treatment-resistant patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD) (n=126) drawn from three studies received a single subanesthetic (0.5mg/kg) ketamine infusion. Dissociative effects were measured using the Clinician-Administered Dissociative States Scale (CADSS). Antidepressant response was measured using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A confirmatory factor analysis established the validity of CADSS subscales (derealization, depersonalization, amnesia), and a general linear model with repeated measures was fitted to test whether subscale scores were associated with antidepressant response.

Results: Factor validity was supported, with a root mean square error of approximation of .06, a comparative fit index of .97, and a Tucker-Lewis index of .96. Across all studies and timepoints, the depersonalization subscale was positively related to HAM-D percent change. A significant effect of derealization on HAM-D percent change was observed at one timepoint (Day7) in one study. The amnesia subscale was unrelated to HAM-D percent change.

Limitations: Possible inadequate blinding; combined MDD/BD datasets might have underrepresented ketamine’s antidepressant efficacy; the possibility of Type I errors in secondary analyses.

Conclusions: From a psychometric perspective, researchers may elect to administer only the CADSS depersonalization subscale, given that it was most closely related to antidepressant response. From a neurobiological perspective, mechanistic similarities may exist between ketamine-induced depersonalization and antidepressant response, although off-target effects cannot be excluded.

Citations in the library

Cited by 85

and 80 more in the library

Cites 15

and 10 more in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice