Skip to content

REC: Just Radical Enough

Myin Erik, D. Hutto Daniel

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric August 26, 2015 DOI: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0020 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Radical enactivism Representational content Perception Language
Citations 25
Key points Argues that the Radical Embodied/Enactive Cognition framework is appropriately positioned between being too radical and not radical enough.

Abstract

We address some frequently encountered criticisms of Radical Embodied/Enactive Cognition. Contrary to the claims that the position is too radical, or not sufficiently so, we claim REC is just radical enough.