Skip to content

The troubling science of neurophenomenology.

James Head, William S Helton

Experimental Brain Research September 1, 2018 DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4623-7 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Cognitive effort Mindlessness Perceptual decoupling Sustained attention Vigilance
Citations 39
Key findings Participants' explicit and implicit awareness of a pre-catch trial word was independent of self-reports of being on- or off-task, challenging the view that mind-wandering reports indicate perceptual decoupling.

Abstract

Researchers suggest links between mind-wandering and impaired processing of external task stimuli: mind-wandering results in perceptual decoupling. The primary methodology employed to investigate the effects of mind-wandering requires people to report their conscious state and then predicts prior behavior or neurophysiological responses using the person's self-report. Unfortunately, this method employs reports that occur after the behavior occurs. An alternative methodology employs a word displayed prior to a performance check or catch trial. After the catch trial, participants then report their awareness of the word occurring, attempt to recognize the word, and also report whether they were on- or off-task. We show that participants' explicit and implicit awareness of the pre-catch trial word is independent of self-reports of conscious state. This finding conflicts with the perspective that mind-wandering reports indicate perceptual decoupling. Reports of mind-wandering may alternatively be how people explain behavioral outcomes.

Comparable studies

Other experimental studies on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics