The Rūḥ and Algorithm: An Islamic Critique of Artificial Intelligence
BALAGH - Journal of Islamic and Humanities Studies June 15, 2026 DOI: 10.65662/balagh.1870689 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractArtificial intelligence reveals both human capabilities and fundamental limitations across philosophical, ethical, metaphysical, and spiritual dimensions. Through systematic analysis of Qur’ānic and classical Islamic sources—including al-Ghazālī’s Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn, Ibn Sīnā’s al-Shifāʾ, and al-Māturīdī’s Kitāb al-Tawḥīd—in dialogue with contemporary AI research, the work argues that the core challenge is not aligning machines with human values but aligning technological development with wisdom and humility. Consciousness (rūḥ) is rooted in divine endowment, not computational simulation. Humans possess genuine capacities but remain inclined toward reductionism and moral displacement. AI serves as a teacher, not replacement; benefit depends on spiritual and moral reformation.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Humanity Consciousness Islam Endowment Human life |
| Key finding | Argues that the ultimate alignment problem lies in aligning human technological development with wisdom, humility, and a proper understanding of humanity's ultimate purpose, not in aligning machine behavior with human values. |
Abstract
Research Problem: The development of artificial intelligence (AI) functions as an unprecedented mirror, reflecting remarkable capacities yet fundamental limitations of human nature across philosophical, ethical, metaphysical, and spiritual dimensions. Method: Adopting a critical correlation methodology, the study conducts a systematic textual analysis of primary Qur’ānic and classical Islamic philosophical sources—principally al-Ghazālī’s Iḥyāʾ ʿUlūm al-Dīn, Ibn Sīnā’s al-Shifāʾ, and al-Māturīdī’s Kitāb al-Tawḥīd—in dialogue with contemporary AI research, including recent debates on machine consciousness (Butlin et al. 2023; Chalmers 2023) and AI ethics (Russell 2019; Floridi 2023). It argues that the ultimate “alignment problem” lies not in aligning machine behavior with human values, but in aligning human technological development with wisdom, humility, and a proper understanding of humanity’s ultimate purpose. From the Islamic perspective, consciousness (rūḥ) transcends computational simulation, as it is rooted in divine endowment rather than material complexity. Results: The human being possesses genuine capacities for insight and progress, yet remains persistently inclined toward reductionism, moral displacement, and spiritual confusion. Conclusion: AI does not emerge as a replacement for humanity but as its most profound teacher. Genuine benefit ultimately depends upon spiritual and moral reformation.