Therapeutic aQompaniments: Walking together in hypnotherapy—and ethnography
Ethos March 17, 2025 DOI: 10.1111/etho.70004 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Ethnography Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Indonesian hypnotherapists and their clients |
| Duration | 16 months of fieldwork |
| Keywords | Ethnography Psychotherapist Anthropology |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key findings | The notion of 'aQompaniment' provides a rubric for evaluating hypnotherapeutic care based on whether therapist and client can successfully walk together toward their respective goals, rather than relying on universal preferences for self-hypnosis or skepticism of individualized therapies. |
Abstract
Abstract Drawing on ethnographic data collected over 16 months of fieldwork with Indonesian hypnotherapists, this article investigates the suitability of different relationalities for providing therapeutic care. Clinical literature often advocates the merits of self‐hypnosis over hetero‐hypnosis, while anthropologists express skepticism regarding therapies that encourage individualized regimes of the self. Taking a less sweeping approach, this article develops the notion of “aQompaniment”—adapted from the liberation theology and activist concept of “accompaniment”—as a rubric under which to evaluate the provision of care and support. The rubric of aQompaniment encourages situated evaluations of whether hypnotherapeutic relations enable therapists and clients to successfully “walk together” toward their respective goals, encouraging nuanced judgments about what constitutes good care. Viewing psychotherapy as aQompaniment also affords new perspectives on the aQompaniment work that can be undertaken during ethnographic research.