Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Continuity and Change in the Role of Mysticism under the Islamic Republic of Iran

Elisheva Machlis

Sociology of Islam April 4, 2022 DOI: 10.1163/22131418-09030002 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Under the Islamic Republic of Iran, 'irfān—a blend of philosophy, theosophy, mysticism, and Shi'i thought—evolved from a marginalized tradition into a central cultural and political force. Prominent clerics and intellectuals across the regime's factions used 'irfān to debate the state's political direction and the balance between its revolutionary and republican elements. Reformists more often employed mysticism in service of politics, while regime supporters used 'irfān to reinforce an exclusive authority based on the rule of the Supreme Jurist. This created a shared spiritual basis among diverse voices and produced a new fusion of mysticism, philosophy, Western thought, politics, Islamic law, and messianism, linking the mystical path with the Shari'a.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords History Philosophy Political science
Citations 1
Key finding Argues that 'irfān became a central phenomenon in the Islamic Republic of Iran, used by both reformist and conservative factions to debate political direction and authority, creating a new blend of mysticism, philosophy, politics, and law.

Abstract

The current study will evaluate the role of ‘irfān [the inner perception of knowledge; combining elements of philosophy, theosophy, mysticism and Shi’i thought] within the Islamic Republic of Iran as a significant component of Iran’s cultural heritage. It will focus on several prominent clerics and intellectuals who represent the regime’s diverse political factions. This article will demonstrate that under the Islamic Republic, ‘irfān evolved from a marginalized area to a central phenomenon and became a tool to debate the political direction of the state and the relationship between its revolutionary and republican elements. While mysticism in the service of politics was more wide-spread among the reformist camp, ardent supporters of the regime resorted to ‘irfān to enhance an exclusive perception of authority based on the rule of the Supreme Jurist. It also created a shared spiritual basis among the Islamic State’s diverse voices. The result was a new blend between mysticism, philosophy, Western thought, politics, Islamic law, and even messianism, within an inter-connectivity between the mystical path and the Shari‘a. Consequently, a complex understanding of ‘irfān has to take into consideration the multiple fusions between Islamic mysticism and other trends and evaluate the result in a specific socio-political context.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment