Psychedelics and cognitive liberty: Reimagining drug policy through the prism of human rights.
International Journal of Drug Policy March 1, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.12.025 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Law |
| Citations | 37 |
| Key points | Argues that the prohibition of psychedelic drugs in the UK breaches the right to cognitive liberty under Article 9 of the ECHR and that this right could be used to challenge the prohibitive system in court. |
Abstract
This paper reimagines drug policy--specifically psychedelic drug policy--through the prism of human rights. Challenges to the incumbent prohibitionist paradigm that have been brought from this perspective to date--namely by calling for exemptions from criminalisation on therapeutic or religious grounds--are considered, before the assertion is made that there is a need to go beyond such reified constructs, calling for an end to psychedelic drug prohibitions on the basis of the more fundamental right to cognitive liberty. This central concept is explicated, asserted as being a crucial component of freedom of thought, as enshrined within Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). It is argued that the right to cognitive liberty is routinely breached by the existence of the system of drug prohibition in the United Kingdom (UK), as encoded within the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 (MDA). On this basis, it is proposed that Article 9 could be wielded to challenge the prohibitive system in the courts. This legal argument is supported by a parallel and entwined argument grounded in the political philosophy of classical liberalism: namely, that the state should only deploy the criminal law where an individual's actions demonstrably run a high risk of causing harm to others. Beyond the courts, it is recommended that this liberal, rights-based approach also inform psychedelic drug policy activism, moving past the current predominant focus on harm reduction, towards a prioritization of benefit maximization. How this might translate in to a different regulatory model for psychedelic drugs, a third way, distinct from the traditional criminal and medical systems of control, is tentatively considered. However, given the dominant political climate in the UK--with its move away from rights and towards a more authoritarian drug policy--the possibility that it is only through underground movements that cognitive liberty will be assured in the foreseeable future is contemplated.
Citations in the library
Cited by 17
- Psychedelic drug use in healthy individuals: A review of benefits, costs, and implications for drug policy Drug Science, Policy and Law 2017
- Lost Saints Fieldwork in Religion March 31, 2020
- Psychedelics and environmental virtues Philosophical Psychology March 29, 2022
- Cognitive liberty and the psychedelic humanities. Frontiers in Psychology May 4, 2023
- 5-Methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine: An Ego-Dissolving Endogenous Neurochemical Catalyst of Creativity Activitas Nervosa Superior August 22, 2019
and 12 more in the library
Cites 4
- Enhanced repertoire of brain dynamical states during the psychedelic experience Human Brain Mapping July 3, 2014
- Ayahuasca Shamanism in the Amazon and Beyond Oxford University Press eBooks June 18, 2014
- Drugs, the Internet and change. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2011
- Experienced Drug Users Assess the Relative Harms and Benefits of Drugs: A Web-Based Survey Journal of Psychoactive Drugs September 1, 2013