Parmenides’ and Śaṅkara’s Nondual Being without Not-being
Philosophy East and West 2016 DOI: 10.1353/pew.2016.0013 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 3 |
| Key points | Argues that Parmenides' being and Śaṅkara's nonduality of Brahman and ātman are similar, and that both use a method of distinction and negative dialectic to guide readers toward knowledge of nondual reality. |
Abstract
This essay explores the similarities in the thought of the Greek philosopher Parmenides (fifth century b.c.e .) and that of the Indian philosopher Śaṅkara (eighth to ninth centuries c.e .). Parmenides’ being is compared to the nonduality of Brahman and ātman , as defended by Sankara. The focus is especially on the methods used by both philosophers to help readers know nondual reality. First, they both make a distinction ( krísis/viveka ) between being (real, Self) and not-being (unreal, Non-self); and second, starting from this distinction, they both test, by means of negative dialectic, what, according to common sense, are the fundamental characteristics of reality.