Skip to content

Mysticism in the Twentieth Century

Daniel Maria Klimek

Medjugorje and the Supernatural April 19, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190679200.003.0004 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Key points Argues that the definitions of mysticism by William James and Evelyn Underhill are critiqued through case studies of three modern mystics.

Abstract

The chapter considers influential definitions of terms like “mysticism,” “mystical,” or “mystical experiences” as formulated by two of the most prominent scholars of mysticism of the twentieth century. The influence of William James to the study of mysticism and his famous four marks of a mystical state is observed. The influence of Evelyn Underhill to the study of mysticism and her defining characteristics of what is true mysticism is observed. The various forms of visionary experiences and locutionary experiences (mystically hearing voices) are studied and the nuances between mystical and visionary experiences are considered. Critiques of the work of James and Underhill are offered and brief case studies of three modern mystics—Maria Valtorta, Therese Neumann, and Gemma Galgani—are considered in support of the critiques.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Explore topics