Far Out: The Extended Denial of Public Access to Psychedelic Therapeutics
Andrew R. Waldeck
Texas A&M Journal of Property Law April 1, 2024 DOI: 10.37419/jpl.v10.i2.8 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Denial Legislation Intellectual property Invention Law and economics Internet privacy |
| Key points | Argues that the Controlled Substances Act has artificially impeded therapeutic innovation with psychedelic substances, delaying public access to the fruits of earlier innovation. |
Abstract
The United States patent regime is designed to promote dissemination of information that undergirds a particular innovation. To incentivize disclosure, inventors are granted a time-limited right to exclude others from practicing the invention, thereby affording the inventor a period in which to commercialize and financially benefit from their inventive contribution. The disclosure provides information sufficient for one of skill in the relevant art to make and use the invention, and the public may freely do so upon the patent’s expiry. Global advancement of human medicine is fundamentally intertwined with the United States patent system; medical progress largely depends upon the exclusionary protections United States patents confer. Ordinarily, the expiry of patents covering therapeutic products and methods yields substantial price reduction, as new market participants seek to establish market share by undercutting the expired patent holder and others. The patent system also yields to the public not only access to new and improved medical technology but also a delayed, unencumbered freedom to make and use the invention upon the patent’s exhaustion. Recently, psychoactive chemical compounds have garnered renewed and international attention. Although many psychedelic substances have had a long history of human use, including within therapeutic contexts, the Controlled Substances Act and related legislation significantly stifled research directed toward developing these substances for medical use. This “artificial” impediment to therapeutic innovation effectively delayed public access to the fruits of earlier innovation.
Citations in the library
Cites 6
- Psilocybin und Psilocin, zwei psychotrope Wirkstoffe aus mexikanischen Rauschpilzen Helvetica Chimica Acta 1959
- The origin of MDMA (ecstasy) revisited: the true story reconstructed from the original documents* Addiction July 8, 2006
- An Exploration of the History and Controversies Surrounding MDMA and MDA Journal of Psychoactive Drugs September 1, 2001
- ‘Hitting Highs at Rock Bottom’: LSD Treatment for Alcoholism, 1950–1970 Social History of Medicine July 17, 2006
- Psychedelic drugs, hippie counterculture, speed and phenobarbital treatment of sedative-hypnotic dependence: a journey to the Haight Ashbury in the Sixties. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2011
and 1 more in the library