Skip to content

Multiplicity in the experience of voice-hearing: A phenomenological inquiry.

Chris R Brewin, Kirsty Phillips, John Morton, Ava J C Mason, Rob Saunders, Eleanor Longden

Journal of Psychiatric Research December 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.10.065 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey Peer reviewed
Population Voice-hearers
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Auditory hallucinations Psychosis Self-reference
Citations 2
Key findings Voice-hearers report an average of about four voices, most male and negative, with child-aged voices significantly less negative than others, and variability is greater between voices within an individual than between utterances of the same voice.

Abstract

Although it is recognized that voice-hearers often report a large number and variety of voices there have been few investigations of this multiplicity. Understanding the phenomenology of voice-hearing can provide a firm foundation for theorizing about its causes. In this international online survey of voice-hearers, details were elicited of the content of up to five utterances associated with up to five voices from each respondent. The contents were independently rated and associated with characteristics of each voice such as its perceived age, whether it had changed over time, and whether it was of a familiar person. We investigated predictors (e.g., diagnoses, voice gender, age first heard) of utterance negativity, length, and whether voices referred to themselves. The average number of voices reported was approximately four. The majority were perceived as male and had negative content. Child-aged voices were significantly less negative than all other voices except those perceived as being elderly. Multi-level analyses indicated that there was significant variability at the level of different utterances within voices but variability was more prominent at the level of different voices within an individual. The data were inconsistent with general cognitive models for hearing voices such as the misattribution of inner speech and were more congruent with a dissociation model of voice-hearing. Our findings support approaches based on subtype or dimensional methods of classifying voices, and additionally indicate that research and clinical assessment may benefit from more systematic assessment of multiplicity.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Survey of entity encounter experiences occasioned by inhaled N,N-dimethyltryptamine: Phenomenology, interpretation, and enduring effects. People who had a memorable entity encounter after taking N,N-dimethyltryptamine 2020 Survey n = 2,561
Future directions in meditation research: Recommendations for expanding the field of contemplative science Meditators 2018 Cross-sectional online survey n = 1,120
The Phenomenology of Lucid Dreaming: An Online Survey Respondents to an online survey about lucid dreams 2014 Online survey n = 684
The neurophenomenology of early psychosis: An integrative empirical study. Ultra-high risk for psychosis patients, first episode psychosis patients, and healthy... 2019 Cross-sectional n = 123
Spontaneous Spiritual Awakenings: Phenomenology, Altered States, Individual Differences, and Well-Being People reporting their most powerful Spontaneous Spiritual or Kundalini Awakening 2021 Mixed within and between-participants self-report survey design n = 152

Citations in the library

Explore topics