Skip to content

The History of Jaina Meditation

Johannes Bronkhorst

Asian Traditions of Meditation October 31, 2016 DOI: 10.21313/hawaii/9780824855680.003.0005 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Key points Argues that the confusing descriptions of meditation in Jaina canonical texts, particularly the misreading of dhyāna lists, led to discontinuities and innovations in the history of Jaina meditation.

Abstract

This essay argues that the many discontinuities and innovations in the history of Jaina meditation stem from the confusing descriptions of meditation in canonical texts, including the Āyāraṅga and the Uttarajjhayaṇa. The term used to denote meditation, dhyāna (or jhāna), is also used for non-meditative mental activity, but canonical lists of four types of dhyāna were typically, and confusingly, read as types of meditation. The only truly meditative type of dhyāna in these lists, “pure meditation”, was often seen as occurring only in the last moments before death, and even came to be considered altogether inaccessible in the present age. The resulting vacuum was filled in different ways by various post-canonical writers, among them Hemacandra, sometimes basing themselves on experience and influence from sources outside Jainism.