Skip to content

Stable Consciousness? The "Hard Problem" Historically Reconstructed and in Perspective of Neurophenomenological Research on Meditation.

Stephan Schleim

Frontiers in Psychology 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914322 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Perspective article Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation Philosophy of mind
Keywords Wilhelm wundt Consciousness Introspection Neurophenomenology Phenomenological psychology
Citations 13
Key points Argues that research on long-term meditators, who can generate stable states of consciousness, provides a valuable paradigm for addressing the hard problem of consciousness within a neurophenomenological framework.

Abstract

Finding a scientific, third-person explanation of subjective experience or phenomenal content is commonly called the "hard problem" of consciousness. There has recently been a surge in neuropsychological research on meditation in general and long-term meditators in particular. These experimental subjects are allegedly capable of generating a stable state of consciousness over a prolonged period of time, which makes experimentation with them an interesting paradigm for consciousness research. This perspective article starts out with a historical reconstruction of the "hard problem," tracing it back to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Emil du Bois-Reymond in the 18th and 19th century, respectively, and the problem of introspection as already acknowledged by Wilhelm Wundt in the 19th century. It then discusses the prospects of research on long-term meditators from a contemporary perspective and with respect to the neurophenomenological research program already advocated by Francisco J. Varela.

Explore topics