On-off synecdoche: a just good enough model of subjective experience
Mario Martinez‐saito
August 23, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/2b4nc_v2 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Synecdoche Phenomenology philosophy Gestalt psychology Inference Cognitive psychology Unconscious mind Identification biology Representation politics Artificial intelligence Epistemology Perception |
| Key points | Proposes that subjective experiences are intermittent because the brain's model of the self is an intermittent, simplified representation invoked only when needed to expedite inference. |
Abstract
We provide an account of the apparent intermittency of subjective experiences, between conscious and unconscious phases, grounded on three parsimonious notions: (1) the brain is an inference engine and stochastic simulator endowed with a good enough generative model of the world inherited via evolution and forged by experience, (2) the brain’s internal model of the self (itself, its body and actions) is an intermittent and simplified representation invoked only when needed to expedite inference, which specifies and enables first-person subjective experiences through the identification of a model of the self (d-self or synecdoche for the p-self) with the physical self (p-self), and (3) realistic monism as a merger of physicalism and panpsychism. This scheme shifts the focus from problematic standalone subjective experiences to the identification of subjective experiences with the system’s model of itself and its contingent attributes, is consistent with the empirical and phenomenological evidence and provides testable predictions: (1) only macroscopic scale information that is expedient for survival (d-self shell) can become subjective experience, and (2) the hub of subjective experience is mostly distributed along the posterior medial cortex.