Skip to content

Intranasal esketamine: real-world clinical practice in treatment-resistant depression and factors associated with treatment response.

Bernhard T Baune, Kevin Rosemann, Dimitri Hefter, Mustafa Tonkul, Erhan Kavakbasi

BMC Psychiatry March 17, 2026 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-026-07980-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Retrospective observational chart review Peer reviewed
Sample size 101
Population Inpatients with treatment-resistant depression at the University Hospital Münster, Germany (mean age 47.7 years; 51.5% women)
Intervention Intranasal esketamine
Measures Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck's Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Topics Depression Ketamine Esketamine
Keywords Humans Antidepressive agents Treatment outcome Administration, intranasal Retrospective studies Adult Middle aged Female Depressive disorder, treatment-resistant Major depression Treatment resistant depression Intranasal esketamine Novel antidepressant agents
Citations 2
Key findings Intranasal esketamine was associated with significant reductions in depression severity in this inpatient cohort: mean MADRS reduction of 10.7 points and BDI-II reduction of 11.5 points, with 28.8% responding, 52.5% showing at least partial response, and 19.3% achieving remission. Older age was associated with higher remission likelihood (OR 4.06) and male gender with partial response (OR 3.71). The authors argue that older patients and those with psychiatric comorbidities may particularly benefit from extended induction beyond eight sessions.

Abstract

Background: Intranasal esketamine has recently emerged as an innovative treatment option for treatment-resistant depression (TRD). This retrospective, uncontrolled study aimed to evaluate the real-world effectiveness of esketamine in an naturalistic inpatient setting and explore demographic and clinical factors associated with treatment response.

Methods: We conducted a chart review of 101 inpatients with TRD treated with intranasal esketamine at the University Hospital Münster, Germany. Depression severity was assessed pretreatment and posttreatment with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Beck’s Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Repeated measures ANOVAs and logistic regression models were applied to identify treatment outcomes and associated factors.

Results: Patients (mean age 47.7 years; 51.5% women) presented with severe depression and frequent psychiatric comorbidities. Esketamine treatment led to significant improvements in MADRS (mean reduction − 10.7, p < 0.001) and BDI-II scores (mean reduction − 11.5, p < 0.001), with large effect sizes. Suicidality scores decreased significantly as well. Overall, 28.8% achieved response, 52.5% at least partial response, and 19.3% remission. Older age was associated with higher remission likelihood (OR 4.06, p = 0.041), while male gender was associated with partial response (OR 3.71, p = 0.012). Extended induction beyond eight sessions was particularly beneficial for older patients and those with psychiatric comorbidities. No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed.

Conclusions: In this large real-world inpatient cohort, intranasal esketamine significantly improved depression severity. Older patients and those with comorbid psychiatric disorders may particularly benefit from extended induction treatment. These findings support intranasal esketamine as an effective therapeutic option in TRD while highlighting the need for further controlled studies to refine patient selection and optimize treatment protocols. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on esketamine for depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Treating bipolar depression with esketamine: Safety and effectiveness data from a naturalistic multicentric study on esketamine in bipolar versus unipolar treatment‐resistant depression Patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression (B-TRD) and unipolar... 2023 Observational cohort n = 70
Comparative Effectiveness of Intravenous Ketamine and Intranasal Esketamine in Clinical Practice Among Patients With Treatment-Refractory Depression: An Observational Study. Adults with treatment-resistant depression 2023 Observational study n = 62
Predicting outcome with Intranasal Esketamine treatment: A machine-learning, three-month study in Treatment-Resistant Depression (ESK-LEARNING) Treatment-resistant depression patients 2023 Retrospective, multicentric, real-world study n = 149
Esketamine in treatment-resistant depression patients comorbid with substance-use disorder: A viewpoint on its safety and effectiveness in a subsample of patients from the REAL-ESK study Patients with treatment-resistant depression and a substance use disorder 2023 Observational, retrospective, multicentre study n = 26
Rapid infusion of esketamine for unipolar and bipolar depression: a retrospective chart review Patients with treatment-resistant depression and bipolar depression meeting DSM-IV-TR... 2017 Retrospective observational study n = 27

Citations in the library

Explore topics

By condition and practice