Skip to content

Entheogens: Psychedelic religion in the United States, part two

Brad Stoddard

Religion Compass November 1, 2023 DOI: 10.1111/rec3.12477 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Keywords Historiography Religiosity Scholarship Sociocultural evolution Politics Psychology of religion Religious experience Criminology Social science Religious studies Psychoanalysis Anthropology Law
Citations 3
Key points Argues that the political, legal, and sociocultural capital associated with psychoactive substances and religion has evolved from the 1980s to the present, as reflected in scholarly literature.

Abstract

Abstract Scholars across the academic spectrum have written about the renewed interest in psychedelics that is commonly called the Psychedelic Renaissance (PR). Psychedelic religion is a major component of the PR, as psychedelic churches are growing exponentially and as people who consume and who research psychedelics routinely contend that these substances induce or occasion religious, spiritual, or mystical experiences. Scholars have noticed the growing association of psychoactive substances and religiosity, and they have addressed this association from a variety of academic fields, methods, and methodologies. Part one of this article (“Entheogens: Psychedelic religion in the United States, Part One”) explored the historiography of associations of psychoactive substances and religiosity in the United States from the 1800s to the 1980s. Part two of this article continues the historiographical analysis of this literature beginning in the 1980s and ends with recent scholarship. Collectively, this analysis highlights the evolving political, legal, and sociocultural capital associated with psychoactive substances and religion.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics