Skip to content

Effects of psychedelics on opioid use disorder: a scoping review of preclinical studies.

Alejandra Pulido-Saavedra, Henrique Nunes Pereira Oliva, Tiago Paiva Prudente, Razi Kitaneh, Eric J Nunes, Colleen Fogg, Melissa C Funaro, Jeremy Weleff, Anahita Bassir Nia, Gustavo A Angarita

Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences January 21, 2025 DOI: 10.1007/s00018-024-05519-2 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Population Preclinical animal studies
Topics Addiction
Keywords Conditioned place preference Self-administration Withdrawal Psychedelics hallucinogens Entheogens Psychedelic compounds Drug rehabilitation Recovery Opioid dependence
Citations 5
Key findings Most preclinical studies found that ibogaine, noribogaine, 18-MC, and ketamine reduced opioid self-administration, withdrawal, and conditioned place preference, but seven studies showed no improvement over controls.

Abstract

The current opioid crisis has had an unprecedented public health impact. Approved medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) exist, yet their limitations indicate a need for innovative treatments. Limited preliminary clinical studies suggest specific psychedelics might aid OUD treatment, though most clinical evidence remains observational, with few controlled trials. This review aims to bridge the gap between preclinical findings and potential clinical applications, following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches included MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on preclinical in vivo studies involving opioids and psychedelics in animals, excluding pain studies and those lacking control groups. Forty studies met criteria, covering both classic and non-classic psychedelics. Most studies showed that 18-methoxycoronaridine (18-MC), ibogaine, noribogaine, and ketamine could reduce opioid self-administration, alleviate withdrawal symptoms, and change conditioned place preference. However, seven studies (two on 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine (DOM), three on ibogaine, one on 18-MC, and one on ketamine) showed no improvement over controls. A methodological quality assessment rated most of the studies as having unclear quality. Interestingly, most preclinical studies are limited to iboga derivatives, which were effective, but these agents may have higher cardiovascular risk than other psychedelics under-explored to date. This review strengthens support for translational studies testing psychedelics as potential innovative targets for OUD. It also suggests clinical studies need to include a broader range of agents beyond iboga derivatives but can also explore several ongoing questions in the field, such as the mechanism of action behind the potential therapeutic effect, safety profiles, doses, and frequency of administrations needed.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on addiction, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine use: a review Ketamine users 2011 Systematic review
Mindfulness Meditation for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review Individuals with substance use disorders 2009 Systematic review
Mindfulness-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Substance and Behavioral Addictions: A Systematic Review 2018 Systematic review
Ketamine for the treatment of mental health and substance use disorders: comprehensive systematic review 2021 Systematic review
Therapeutic Use of LSD in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trials Patients with psychiatric disorders, primarily alcoholism 2020 Systematic review n = 567

Citations in the library

Cited by 6

and 1 more in the library

Cites 68

and 63 more in the library

Explore topics