Causal Inference in Studies with Functional Unmasking: Psychedelics and Beyond
Gabriel Loewinger, Mats J. Stensrud, Sandeep M. Nayak, David B. Yaden, Alexander W. Levis
medRxiv Preprint Server December 5, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.64898/2025.12.05.25341713 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Key points | Proposes that feedback mechanisms between perceived therapeutic benefits and expectancies can render traditional methods prone to obscuring or exaggerating therapeutic benefits in psychedelic clinical trials, and that modern causal inference approaches can mitigate functional unmasking. |
Abstract
In clinical trials for mental health treatments, functional unmasking (unblinding) is a widespread challenge wherein participants become aware of their assigned treatment. Unmasking is especially concerning with psychedelics, due to the near unmistakable acute effects (the “trip”), resulting in uncertainty about whether outcomes following treatment reflect true therapeutic properties of the interventions, or placebo-like effects. We present a counterfactual conceptualization of unmasking that 1) formalizes the shortcomings of many existing statistical and experimental design solutions (e.g., dose-response, active controls), and 2) demonstrates how modern causal inference approaches can be applied to isolate effects devoid of this “contamination.” Our results reveal feedback mechanisms between perceived therapeutic benefits and expectancies that can render traditional methods prone to obscuring or exaggerating therapeutic benefits. Our proposal motivates trial designs and statistical methods that can be implemented to mitigate the impacts of functional unmasking.