Skip to content

Psychedelics and cognitive function: A systematic review

Caíque Gois Cardoso, Milena de Barros Viana

Research, Society and Development December 13, 2023 DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v12i14.44436 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review Peer reviewed
Sample size 46
Population Healthy volunteers
Topics Ayahuasca LSD MDMA Mescaline Psilocybin
Keywords Hallucinogen Cognition Amphetamine Dissociative Clinical psychology
Citations 2
Key findings MDMA was the most studied psychedelic in cognitive function research, and no serious adverse effects were reported, though long-term risks remain unassessed.

Abstract

Introduction: With the progressive advancement of clinical and experimental trials aimed at investigating the pharmacotherapeutic potential of psychedelic substances, there is also the development of other conceptions of use, not only for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, but also for the improvement of emotional/cognitive functions.

Objective: The present study is a systematic review of investigations aimed at evaluating the effects of psychedelics on cognitive functions in healthy volunteers.

Methods: A search was performed in PubMed database, using the search terms “psychedelics and cognitive enhancement” and “psychedelics and cognitive performance”. Results and

Conclusions: Of the experimental studies analyzed, only forty-six (46) met the inclusion criteria. The results obtained showed that 3,4-methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) was the most studied drug, with eighteen (18) articles. Fourteen (14) articles were published with psilocybin. Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) ranked third, with six (6) articles; other two (2) studies focused on investigating the beverage ayahuasca, and another (1) its psychoactive-containing molecule: dimethyltryptamine (DMT). Eight (8) studies investigated the effects of other psychedelic drugs, like S-ketamine, mescaline, 3,4-methylenedioxy-amphetamine (MDE), and ibogaine. Although there were no serious adverse effects resulting from the use of the investigated psychedelic drugs, rigorous assessment of the potential risks of long-term use and of the advantages of the continuous use of these drugs through neuropsychological assessments are still warranted.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on mescaline, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Risk assessment of ritual use of oral dimethyltryptamine (DMT) and harmala alkaloids Humans (ritual ayahuasca use) 2006 Systematic review
Drug–drug interactions involving classic psychedelics: A systematic review 2023 Systematic review
Psychedelic‐assisted treatment for substance use disorder: A narrative systematic review Participants in studies of psychedelic-assisted treatment for alcohol, tobacco, and... 2025 Systematic review n = 2,035
The immunomodulatory effects of classical psychedelics: A systematic review of preclinical studies Preclinical animal and in vitro studies 2024 Systematic review
Drug-drug interactions between classic psychedelics and psychoactive drugs: a systematic review Humans 2023 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics