Skip to content

Dreaming: a conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research

Choice Reviews Online January 20, 2016 DOI: 10.5860/choice.193885 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Dreaming Philosophy of mind
Citations 121
Key points Argues that a philosophical analysis of the concept of dreaming, informed by empirical research, can enrich and extend the conceptual repertoire for discussions of consciousness and the self.

Abstract

Dreams, conceived as conscious experience or phenomenal states during sleep, offer an important contrast condition for theories of consciousness and the self. Yet, although there is a wealth of empirical research on sleep and dreaming, its potential contribution to consciousness research and philosophy of mind is largely overlooked. This might be due, in part, to a lack of conceptual clarity and an underlying disagreement about the nature of the phenomenon of dreaming itself. In Dreaming, Jennifer Windt lays the groundwork for solving this problem. She develops a conceptual framework describing not only what it means to say that dreams are conscious experiences but also how to locate dreams relative to such concepts as perception, hallucination, and imagination, as well as thinking, knowledge, belief, deception, and self-consciousness. Arguing that a conceptual framework must be not only conceptually sound but also phenomenologically plausible and carefully informed by neuroscientific research, Windt integrates her review of philosophical work on dreaming, both historical and contemporary, with a survey of the most important empirical findings. This allows her to work toward a systematic and comprehensive new theoretical understanding of dreaming informed by a critical reading of contemporary research findings. Windt's account demonstrates that a philosophical analysis of the concept of dreaming can provide an important enrichment and extension to the conceptual repertoire of discussions of consciousness and the self and raises new questions for future research.

In the evidence

This study is part of the evidence base for a synthesis in the library. Here is how each one recorded it.

  • Argues that a philosophically sound, phenomenologically plausible conceptual framework informed by empirical research can enrich discussions of consciousness and the self through the study of dreaming.

    Synthesized

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Metaphor and hyperassociativity: the imagination mechanisms behind emotion assimilation in sleep and dreaming 2015 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Varieties of Lucid Dreaming Experience 2000 Theoretical or philosophical paper
Experimental Research on Dreaming: State of the Art and Neuropsychoanalytic Perspectives 2011 Theoretical or philosophical paper
The Neurobiology of Consciousness: Lucid Dreaming Wakes Up 2009 Theoretical or philosophical paper
A cognitive model of recurrent nightmares 2008 Theoretical or philosophical paper

Citations in the library

Explore topics