Skip to content

Well-being, problematic alcohol consumption and acute subjective drug effects in past-year ayahuasca users: a large, international, self-selecting online survey

Will Lawn, Jaime E. C. Hallak, José Alexandre S. Crippa, Rafael G. Dos Santos, Lilla Porffy, Monica J Barratt, Jason Ferris, Adam Winstock, Celia J. A. Morgan

Scientific Reports November 3, 2017 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-14700-6 (opens in new tab)

The journal has published a correction to this paper. Read the correction (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional survey Randomized Longitudinal Peer reviewed
Sample size 96,901
Population Online, self-selecting global respondents who reported drug use patterns
Topics Ayahuasca LSD
Keywords Hallucinogen Demographics
Citations 78
Key findings Ayahuasca users reported greater well-being and less problematic drinking than classic psychedelic users, but both psychedelic groups reported more problematic drinking than non-psychedelic drug users.

Abstract

Abstract Ayahuasca is a natural psychedelic brew, which contains dimethyltryptamine (DMT). Its potential as a psychiatric medicine has recently been demonstrated and its non-medical use around the world appears to be growing. We aimed to investigate well-being and problematic alcohol use in ayahuasca users, and ayahuasca’s subjective effects. An online, self-selecting, global survey examining patterns of drug use was conducted in 2015 and 2016 (n = 96,901). Questions were asked about: use of ayahuasca, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and magic mushrooms; demographics, current well-being and past-year problematic alcohol use of past-year ayahuasca users and comparison drug users; and subjective effects of ayahuasca and comparison drugs. Ayahuasca users (n = 527) reported greater well-being than both classic psychedelic users (n = 18,138) and non-psychedelic drug-using respondents (n = 78,236). Ayahuasca users reported less problematic drinking than classic psychedelic users, although both groups reported greater problematic drinking than the other respondents. Ayahuasca’s acute subjective effects usually lasted for six hours and were most strongly felt one hour after consumption. Within our online, self-selecting survey, ayahuasca users reported better well-being than comparison groups and less problematic drinking than classic psychedelic users. Future longitudinal studies of international samples and randomised controlled trials are needed to dissect the effects of ayahuasca on these outcomes.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on ayahuasca, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Survey of subjective "God encounter experiences": Comparisons among naturally occurring experiences and those occasioned by the classic psychedelics psilocybin, LSD, ayahuasca, or DMT Adults reporting a single most memorable God encounter experience, either nondrug or... 2019 Cross-sectional survey n = 4,285
Adverse effects of ayahuasca: Results from the Global Ayahuasca Survey. Ayahuasca users from more than 50 countries who completed an online survey 2022 Cross-sectional survey n = 10,836
Ayahuasca in adolescence: a preliminary psychiatric assessment. Adolescents from a Brazilian ayahuasca sect and matched controls 2005 Controlled cross-sectional study n = 80
Psychological and neuropsychological assessment of regular hoasca users. Regular hoasca users from a U.S. branch of União do Vegetal and matched non-user controls 2016 Cross-sectional study n = 57
Indoleamine Hallucinogens in Cluster Headache: Results of the Clusterbusters Medication Use Survey People with cluster headache 2015 Cross-sectional survey n = 496

Citations in the library

Cited by 62

and 57 more in the library

Cites 24

and 19 more in the library

Explore topics